The Clarinet BBoard
|
Author: Paul Aviles
Date: 2018-10-06 19:44
Ah.....I've used both!
The advantage of the Hercules was that it was cute and fun to use (shallow but true) and consequently I used it more. But I agree that the center of mass is higher and that makes it less stable than it should be. I actually knocked my clarinet side to side on both stands and found they are pretty much the same (the longer K&M). The other disadvantage to the Hercules is that it wears out faster (reliant on more plastic parts for structural stability as a stand). Mine lasted about three years.
I wound up replacing the Hercules with the SHORT (newer) K&M which I noticed from images actually has FIVE legs! The extra leg helps make it more stable than either the longer brother or the Hercules. I also added three velcro strips (the soft/fuzzy side) to the cone........perfection.
Still if you are headed toward a pit........Blayman.
.............Paul Aviles
|
|
|
m1964 |
2018-10-06 18:06 |
|
Hank Lehrer |
2018-10-06 18:44 |
|
Re: K&M vs Hercules- advice needed |
|
Paul Aviles |
2018-10-06 19:44 |
|
m1964 |
2018-10-06 21:02 |
|
kdk |
2018-10-06 20:04 |
|
Paul Aviles |
2018-10-07 01:26 |
|
m1964 |
2018-10-07 01:45 |
|
Ed |
2018-10-07 17:56 |
|
m1964 |
2018-10-07 19:27 |
|
The Clarinet Pages
|
|